Fire Safety has and always will be a well-documented subject, with various experts and regulatory bodies sharing key insights that save lives. Despite this, practical knowledge can sometimes be overshadowed by false information and myth. Karen Trigg of Allegion UK investigates some common fire safety myths and uncovers the correct way to handle fire safety.
Safety as a wider area has always been one that has courted myth and rumour. Most will be aware of the more amusing health and safety myths, such as the HSE example of children being banned from playing conkers unless they wore safety goggles.
Some of the more classic myths may seem light-hearted and relatively harmless but they are indicative of a much more serious issue that exists, whereby real and practical safety knowledge is replaced with unreliable information. This information is passed from person to person and may not actually be grounded in fact at all. And in a more serious context, such as fire safety, that presents a danger.
Fire safety itself has more than its share of myths and misconceptions too, all proving to be more dangerous than safety goggles and conkers. Treating fire safety knowledge as something that can be shared nonchalantly between one unreliable source to another, rather than learned from credible sources, could put facility managers, businesses and building occupants alike at risk in the event of a fire.
No Smoke Without Fire
With the stakes naturally being so high, fire safety is often shrouded in controversy. Official guidelines and resources are sometimes sidelined and not followed as they should be. But with us all living in a time where information is so easy to obtain, why are those responsible for fire safety decisions still getting it wrong?
Simply put, misinformation is a prominent issue. In fact, the spread of inconsistent and incorrect information mimics fire itself. Commonly, fiction has always surrounded that of fire safety equipment to some extent, and it only takes one to pass that material on for it to result in an unfortunate fire emergency. Some of the more common fire safety myths include:
- Once fire safety equipment (such as fire alarms, smoke detectors and even door hardware) is fitted, it no longer requires maintenance.
- In the event of a fire, flames cause more casualties than smoke.
- The older a building is, the more prone to fire it is.
- The gap between the fire door and its surrounding frame isn’t important.
All of these statements are in fact false and dangerous, yet are believed by pockets of individuals that are subsequently putting their buildings and people’s lives at risk.
One of the more prevalent (and most perilous) fire safety inaccuracies surrounds the use of fire doors and their operation. Under UK law, fire doors can’t be propped or wedged open. Yet, we’ve all seen instances of fire doors being used incorrectly. In the event of a fire, a propped open fire door is useless and will fail to compartmentalise the fire and toxic smoke filling the building, instead facilitating the spread of it.
Some fire safety myths are born purely from convenience, with responsible parties often trying to bend the rules to something that suits the operation of their building. For example, it may be that fire doors slow the movement of people through a building or act as an additional obstacle when items are moved throughout the premises and as a result, they’re illegally left open. Despite the dangers and risk of fines, penalties and prison, a large proportion of people who do so fail to see the safety of occupants as a priority until disaster strikes.
Perhaps this is where a lack of education plays a part in the spread of misinformation. Today, decision makers and installers have a variety of options when it comes to fire door hardware, with tailored options able to adapt to a building’s specific needs.
Electromagnetic door control solutions for example, can be linked to a building’s alarm system with fire doors kept in an open position until the alarm is sounded, fixing potential convenience issues in a safe and sustainable way. By correctly specifying products that suit the use of a building more closely, not only can we educate decision makers further, but there’s an opportunity to significantly increase fire safety standards, too.
For gaps in practical knowledge, such as the process of fire door and equipment checks, industry standard guidelines are readily available from legitimate experts and regulatory bodies. Helpful guidelines and checklists on everything from door hardware to fire safety compliance are also accessible. However, this information must now be used more regularly, replacing the gossip and conjecture that is unfortunately being followed by too many.
With the legal regulations and ramifications at stake, it’s imperative to educate ourselves on a subject that can rapidly turn into a life-or-death matter.
The Key to Fire Safety
Most fires are preventable. By adopting accurate procedures and fire safety practices, decision makers can prepare themselves and their buildings for the worst, creating a safer environment and sharing authentic knowledge on the subject.
Only when we eliminate the ‘corner cutting’ and reduce the potency of fire safety myths can we truly achieve a fire safe future.
Allegion (NYSE: ALLE) is a global pioneer in seamless access, with leading brands like CISA®, Interflex®, LCN®, Schlage®, SimonsVoss® and Von Duprin®. Focusing on security around the door and adjacent areas, Allegion secures people and assets with a range of solutions for homes, businesses, schools and institutions. Allegion had $2.9 billion revenue in 2019 and sells products in almost 130 countries.
For more information, go to www.allegion.com